Bug#748535: transition: gnutls28
On 2014-05-20 Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 19:47:48 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> Afaik it is not possible to change the versioning scheme and move from
>> soname.1 foo@0 bar@1 baz@1
>> to
>> soname.1 foo@1 bar@1 baz@1
>> without breaking the ABI, is it?
> Yep.
So we would need to change the binary package name and do a soname bump,
correct?
> I wonder if building gnutls with -Bsymbolic wouldn't already be an
> improvement, by avoiding internal calls getting resolved to the wrong
> lib...
Thinking about gnutls_init or the fact that some functions now support
more algoritms I don't think that would be enough.
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
Reply to: