[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#739611: Current status of ruby1.9.1-rm transition



A quick status update of the current state of the transition. If
ruby1.9.1 was removed today, the following things would break /
removed too:

coquelicot # FTBFS (ruby1.9.1)
sup-mail # FTBFS (ruby1.9.1) + waiting for xapian-bindings
ruby-libvirt # not-ruby-caused FTBFS

# ruby-gnome2 FTBFS 744809 - autoremoval scheduled for 2014-05-29
ruby-gnome2 ruby-atk ruby-cairo-gobject ruby-gdk-pixbuf2 ruby-gdk3 ruby-gio2 ruby-glib2 ruby-gobject-introspection ruby-gstreamer ruby-gtk2 ruby-gtk3 ruby-gtksourceview2 ruby-gtksourceview3 ruby-pango ruby-poppler ruby-rsvg2 ruby-vte ruby-vte3 kindleclip mhc mikutter rabbit ruby-globalhotkeys screenruler rabbit

# ruby-patron FTBFS 744034 - autoremoval scheduled for 2014-05-08
ruby-patron ruby-faraday ruby-omniauth-twitter ruby-sham-rack rabbit ruby-faraday-middleware ruby-oauth2 ruby-sawyer ruby-twitter ruby-carrierwave ruby-typhoeus  ruby-octokit ruby-omniauth-oauth2 ruby-tinder ruby-omniauth-facebook ruby-omniauth-facebook ruby-omniauth-google-oauth2

# waiting to transition to testing
cairo-dock-plug-ins evernote-mode swig2.0 xapian-bindings


Some more details for select packages:

 - a fixed version of xapian-bindings has been uploaded today, and
   it built everywhere.
 - work on a newer ruby-gnome2 is ongoing.

The packages that are currently waiting to transition unfortuntely
don't appear in the transition tracker as bad; for the next
transition we need to be more careful with the ben filters.

Apart from the packages waiting to transition my personal opinion
would be to break/remove the listed packages from testing.

Thoughts?

-- 
 ,''`.  Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C  D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03
  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: