[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#738791: marked as done (transition: qhull)

Your message dated Sun, 27 Apr 2014 22:11:03 +0200
with message-id <20140427201103.GI4146@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#738791: transition: qhull
has caused the Debian Bug report #738791,
regarding transition: qhull
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
738791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738791
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

The qhull library was upgraded from 2009.1 to 2012.1, fixing a number
of bugs.  Upstream bumped the SO from 5 to 6, for good reason, so all
the packages that use it need to be rebuilt.  (This includes in
particular octave3.8.)  Please go ahead and trigger the appropriate
binNMUs.

Although I would not anticipate any difficulty, do let me know if any
packages that build-depend on libqhull-dev require help getting them
to build with the new version and I will do what I can to help.

See https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-qhull.html

Ben file:

title = "qhull";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libqhull5" | .depends ~ "libqhull6";
is_good = .depends ~ "libqhull6";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libqhull5";

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 22:58:01 +0000, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> The qhull library was upgraded from 2009.1 to 2012.1, fixing a number
> of bugs.  Upstream bumped the SO from 5 to 6, for good reason, so all
> the packages that use it need to be rebuilt.  (This includes in
> particular octave3.8.)  Please go ahead and trigger the appropriate
> binNMUs.
> 
I think the removal of sparc from testing means libqhull5 is finally
gone.  Closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: