Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:21:55 +0100 with message-id <20140212112155.GX17725@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#719227: transition: poppler 0.22 has caused the Debian Bug report #719227, regarding transition: poppler 0.22 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 719227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: poppler 0.22
- From: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 15:45:19 +0200
- Message-id: <20130809134519.6839.93451.reportbug@drak>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: block -1 by 679896 719224 712688 Hi, I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.22.x transition. Currently there is Poppler 0.22.x in experimental already. Please note that there are still few issues that prevents it to be started, so I'm filing this at this time to have this transition considered by the release team. This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways: - libpoppler19 → libpoppler37 - libpoppler-glib8 -- BC with 0.18; provides symbols file (with few new symbols though) - libpoppler-qt4-3 → libpoppler-qt4-4 Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition, and their situation, sorted by solutions: Sources that compile fine, and can be binNMU'ed: calligra (poppler, poppler-qt4) comparepdf (poppler-qt4) cups-filters (poppler) diffpdf (poppler-qt4) gambas3 (poppler) gdcm (poppler) gnome-commander (poppler) inkscape (poppler) katarakt (poppler-qt4) kbibtex (poppler-qt4) ktikz (poppler-qt4) libreoffice (poppler) luatex (poppler) nepomuk-core (poppler-qt4) okular (poppler-qt4) pdf2djvu (poppler) pdftoipe (poppler) popplerkit.framework (poppler) prerex (poppler-qt4) python-poppler-qt4 (poppler-qt4) qcomicbook (poppler-qt4) qpdfview (poppler-qt4) tellico (poppler-qt4) texlive-bin (poppler) texmaker (poppler-qt4) texstudio (poppler-qt4) texworks (poppler-qt4) Sources that currently FTBFS: * gdal (poppler) gdal currently in unstable FTBFS with new Poppler (#679887), while the version in experimental builds fine. OTOH, gdal/experimental needs a transition (#712688). * xpdf (poppler) The patches needed to compile with poppler 0.22.x are not compatible with poppler 0.18, so they cannot be uploaded to unstable right now. They are #679896 (for 0.18 → 0.20) and #719224 (for 0.20 → 0.22). Other cases: * derivations (poppler) This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of that application are left in the resulting arch:all package. It currently FTBFS with Poppler >= 0.20 (#690161), but given what said above it can be left out of the transition (the bug severity will be raised to "serious" once the transition starts). I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the following usertag: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pino@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.20 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pino@debian.org;tag=poppler-0.22 A ben tracker for poppler would have: title = "poppler 0.22"; is_affected = .build-depends ~ "libpoppler-private-dev" | .build-depends ~ "libpoppler-qt4-dev"; is_good = .depends ~ "libpoppler37" | .depends ~ "libpoppler-qt4-4"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libpoppler19" | .depends ~ "libpoppler-qt4-3"; Thanks, -- Pino
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>, 719227-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#719227: transition: poppler 0.22
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:21:55 +0100
- Message-id: <20140212112155.GX17725@betterave.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <20130809134519.6839.93451.reportbug@drak>
- References: <20130809134519.6839.93451.reportbug@drak>
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 15:45:19 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Control: block -1 by 679896 719224 712688 > > Hi, > > I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.22.x transition. > Currently there is Poppler 0.22.x in experimental already. Please note > that there are still few issues that prevents it to be started, > so I'm filing this at this time to have this transition considered > by the release team. > All done now. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---