[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#729289: whatever you want to call this: openscenegraph



On 2014-01-30 01:42, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> (This may or may not be called a transition, but certainly isn't fixed.)
> 

Hi,

Thanks for reopening the bug. :)

> Current status (note that the tracker isn't currently being updated):
> osgearth: OK
> simgear/flightgear/fgrun: Fixed simgear uploaded (but is a new upstream
> version, so has to go through the NEW queue), flightgear/fgrun to follow
> soon
> libcitygml: NMU in DELAYED
> choreonoid #735891: patch exists, no maintainer response; NMU?
> openwalnut #718381: no fix yet (being worked on upstream)
> 

And thanks for the status as well.

> Not involved in 80->99, but will be in 99->100:
> ossim #735814 (openthreads only): fixed version in UbuntuGIS PPA, upload
> to Debian in preparation
> qgis (newly-added dependency in NEW queue): probably OK
> 
> 

On the topic of 99->100, do you know if that will happen any time soon?
 I am wondering whether we should go for finishing the 80->99 and do a
separate 99->100 or wait and jump directly from 80->100.  If 100 is
coming soon, it is probably easiest to do 80->100 (will save us a couple
of rebuilds and we waiting for other things right now anyway).
  On the other hand, I would hate for this transition to drag on waiting
for a new version that isn't happening while blocking other packages
from reaching testing.

~Niels


Reply to: