Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3
- To: Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@nes.ru>
- Cc: 698778@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#698778: preapproval of expect/5.45-3
- From: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 19:03:31 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 8561pdmcuk.fsf@boum.org>
- Reply-to: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>, 698778@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <CAOq2pXF0DWJ0ib-2N+Q+H5hOiKsJAAALrRxH8EwTMc0nzabULw@mail.gmail.com> (Sergei Golovan's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2013 02:07:34 +0400")
- References: <20130123140050.7570.85481.reportbug@jupiter.golovan.home> <20130124070704.GA15553@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com> <20130125201527.GB11479@radis.cristau.org> <CAOq2pXH64kCoUhaJ1DLV4eS9Mq8Q8-fR2Dg-iZogbrHWrtJ-Tg@mail.gmail.com> <85li9jh8hc.fsf@boum.org> <20130319183810.GE5840@radis.cristau.org> <20130929213750.GC21946@mraw.org> <CAOq2pXHyw26-hvLwzB2MnZ+dodXLyYPT5uNQ2crgiPqMbJOByQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130929215950.GE21946@mraw.org> <CAOq2pXF0DWJ0ib-2N+Q+H5hOiKsJAAALrRxH8EwTMc0nzabULw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Sergei Golovan wrote (29 Sep 2013 22:07:34 GMT) :
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote:
>> Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@nes.ru> (2013-09-30):
>>> I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No
>>> complains whatsoever.
>>
>> yes, I saw that, and that's nice. That doesn't buy us squeeze→wheezy
>> upgrade testing, though, which is what we would like to avoid breaking
>> or worsening.
> True. But as far as I see, the current situation with this upgrade is
> far from perfect. It silently breaks expectk and packages which depend
> on it. With conflict the user can choose whether to remove expectk or
> to retain the old expect.
My understanding is that this 1-year old proposed update will be
blocked as long as no super-serious testing of its effect on the
Squeeze->Wheezy upgrade is done.
Does anyone here intend to do so at some point, or should we close
this bug?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
Reply to: