Bug#736136: marked as done (nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_2.23.52.20130612-1+3)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:28:37 +0100
with message-id <52DCC215.8030708@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#736136: nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_2.23.52.20130612-1+3
has caused the Debian Bug report #736136,
regarding nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_2.23.52.20130612-1+3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
736136: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736136
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team,
I would appreciate a binNMU of binutils-mingw-w64 so it's rebuilt with
binutils 2.24.
Thanks in advance,
Stephen
nmu binutils-mingw-w64_2.23.52.20130612-1+3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with binutils 2.24."
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2014-01-20 07:12, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I would appreciate a binNMU of binutils-mingw-w64 so it's rebuilt with
> binutils 2.24.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Stephen
>
>
> nmu binutils-mingw-w64_2.23.52.20130612-1+3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with binutils 2.24."
>
> [...]
Scheduled, thanks.
For future reference, we need the version of the source package (rather
than the version of the binary package), since all binaries from a given
source are rebuilt.
~Niels
--- End Message ---
Reply to: