Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2013-11-28): > Thanks for the quick response, attached the new debdiff mentioning the > problem with munin-node. Can I go ahead with the upload? Looks nice, thanks! > > (Not planning to address the $peeraddr bit at some point?) > > Yes sure, can go also addressing that. But I would prefer to have the > fix integrated upstream first, and in unstable (altough it is trivial > to check first if value is defined ...; is this fine with you? Once > this is done for unstable, I then could open a new pu request). I agree having an upstream fix would be nice (tested for a while in unstable); no urgency, just wondering whether you had plans since it was mentioned in the bug report. If nobody hits this issue, not fixing is probably OK too… Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature