[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#729517: marked as done (nmu: plasma-widget-smooth-tasks_1flupp0~hg20120610-2)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:51:45 +0000
with message-id <ddd370e5fba8375a643f007826344b8f@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#729517: nmu: plasma-widget-smooth-tasks_1flupp0~hg20120610-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #729517,
regarding nmu: plasma-widget-smooth-tasks_1flupp0~hg20120610-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
729517: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729517
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu plasma-widget-smooth-tasks_1flupp0~hg20120610-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild 
against plasma"

Since plasma changes ABI, the package needs recompilation.

Thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.11.6a (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Salvo Tomaselli

http://ltworf.github.io/ltworf/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2013-11-13 20:23, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

On 2013-11-12 17:33, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
nmu plasma-widget-smooth-tasks_1flupp0~hg20120610-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild 
against plasma"

Since plasma changes ABI, the package needs recompilation.


Indeed - i.e. it's a transition, and a so far not greatly
co-ordinated one at that. :-(


That's looking better now.


fwiw I'm not scheduling this right now as I'd like to actually be
able to track this as a proper transition rather than a bunch of
piecemeal requests. That's somewhat blocking on a reply to
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/11/msg00132.html though.


Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: