Hi, Alle lunedì 12 agosto 2013, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto: > On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 20:08 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Alle domenica 11 agosto 2013, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto: > > > On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 14:10 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > > That said, we are tackling few issues/regressions (mostly in > > > > the new pim stack), so could it be possible to hold the > > > > kde4libs migration with a block for now? (It should avoid all > > > > the rest to migrate too.) > > > > > > What's the current status here? > > > > Regarding the rest, I'm sure Sune could give an update of the > > status. > > In terms of RC bugs, the only issues I could see are a couple of > FTBFS - tagua and kdenetwork. tagua is leaf, so could be removed > until it's fixed. kdenetwork appears to be tied up with another > transition but AIUI isn't part of the core transition so shouldn't > block the majority of packages from migrating. IIRC kdenetwork is tied with kde-workspace. > We're now hitting a month since the transition started in unstable. > I'm wary that we don't let perfect be the enemy of "perfectly > reasonable" here. It's early in the cycle and if any remaining > issues aren't critical then could we get the current set of packages > migrated and work on the final polishing afterwards? We had (and still have) regressions (from minor to potentially important as #717040) in kmail. I asked Sune to take a look at bugs, and he did nothing. So, given that things are getting stuck because of us, I'm getting prodded in different channels, different new transitions are coming up, and I don't have time/experience to debug the aforementioned issues, I (reluctantly, from my personal POV) ask to unblock kde4libs and let things migrate. (You most probably need to either age or remove from testing tagua.) -- Pino Toscano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.