[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#709847: marked as done (transition: libgnomekbd)

Your message dated Tue, 13 Aug 2013 03:44:17 +0200
with message-id <20130813014417.GG13101@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#709847: transition: libgnomekbd
has caused the Debian Bug report #709847,
regarding transition: libgnomekbd
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
709847: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709847
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello!

I'd like to request a slot for taking care of a small transition
as part of the pkg-gnome team for libgnomekbd 3.6.0.
The new upstream release has bumped soname.

reverse-depends -b libgnomekbd-dev

Reverse-Build-Depends
=====================
* gnome-control-center
* gnome-screensaver
* gnome-settings-daemon


I've tried rebuilding the current versions in unstable of the above packages
(g-c-c 1:3.4.3.1-2, g-scr 3.4.1-1, g-s-d 3.4.2+git20121218.7c1322-3).

Unfortunately g-c-c currently FTBFS in unstable, because of libgoa-1.0-dev 3.8.

------------
In file included from /usr/include/goa-1.0/goabackend/goabackend.h:32:0,
                 from cc-online-accounts-panel.c:31:                            /usr/include/goa-1.0/goabackend/goaprovider.h:141:14: note: expected 'struct GtkGrid *' but argument is of type 'struct GtkTable *'
cc-online-accounts-panel.c:383:34: error: too few arguments to function 'goa_provider_show_account'
------------

The fix is either to get the g-c-c version from experimental into unstable,
or something along the lines of:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2012-April/msg07554.html

The other two packages rebuild fine against the new libgnomekbd.

If/when I get the go ahead with this transition I'll take care of getting
g-c-c to build in unstable again.... (if it hasn't already been resolved
by then).


Ben file:

title = "libgnomekbd";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libgnomekbd7" | .depends ~ "libgnomekbd8";
is_good = .depends ~ "libgnomekbd8";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libgnomekbd7";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (300, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 02:14:51 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I'd like to request a slot for taking care of a small transition
> as part of the pkg-gnome team for libgnomekbd 3.6.0.
> The new upstream release has bumped soname.
> 
All done now.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: