[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#715218: marked as done (nmu: adabrowse_4.0.3)

Your message dated Sat, 3 Aug 2013 17:58:03 +0200
with message-id <20130803155803.GB28839@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#715218: nmu: adabrowse_4.0.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #715218,
regarding nmu: adabrowse_4.0.3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
715218: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=715218
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu adabrowse_4.0.3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild in a current sid environment."

adequate reports

  adequate: ldd -r /usr/bin/adabrowse: /usr/bin/adabrowse: Symbol `asis__representation_clause_kindsS' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
  adequate: ldd -r /usr/bin/adabrowse: /usr/bin/adabrowse: Symbol `asis__element_kindsN' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
  adequate: ldd -r /usr/bin/adabrowse: /usr/bin/adabrowse: Symbol `asis__representation_clause_kindsN' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
  adequate: ldd -r /usr/bin/adabrowse: /usr/bin/adabrowse: Symbol `asis__declaration_kindsN' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking

so lets do a rebuild ... although both adabrowse and libasis2010
haven't changed for a long time, so maybe this is already a longstanding
issue.

Andreas

PS: I verified that all these symbol size mismatches reported by adequate
are fixed by rebuilding in sid.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Jul  8, 2013 at 10:30:15 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> > so lets do a rebuild ... although both adabrowse and libasis2010
> > haven't changed for a long time, so maybe this is already a longstanding
> > issue.
> > 
> Either some lib's ABI changed and that's a bug that should be fixed.  Or
> it didn't and we don't need to rebuild anything.
> 
So let's not.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: