[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#710782: marked as done (transition: openturns)

Your message dated Fri, 2 Aug 2013 19:44:35 +0200
with message-id <20130802174435.GV28839@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#710782: transition: openturns
has caused the Debian Bug report #710782,
regarding transition: openturns
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
710782: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710782
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

openturns 1.1 has been uploaded into experimental, and introduces a
soname bump. Version 1.1-3 uploaded few days ago should build fine
everywhere if buildds have enough RAM, all issues found in earlier
versions should now be fixed.
Thus I would like to upload this version into unstable.

No packages depend directly on libopenturns0.1, but eficas
build-depends on python-openturns (which itself depends on
libopenturns0.1/0.2) and feel++ build-depends on libopenturns-dev.  It
is not clear to me whether these dependencies are really necessary,
but this is another story.

Please tell me whether uploading openturns 1.1-3 into unstable is fine by you.

Thanks,
Denis

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Jun  2, 2013 at 12:42:12 +0200, D. Barbier wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hello,
> 
> openturns 1.1 has been uploaded into experimental, and introduces a
> soname bump. Version 1.1-3 uploaded few days ago should build fine
> everywhere if buildds have enough RAM, all issues found in earlier
> versions should now be fixed.
> Thus I would like to upload this version into unstable.
> 
> No packages depend directly on libopenturns0.1, but eficas
> build-depends on python-openturns (which itself depends on
> libopenturns0.1/0.2) and feel++ build-depends on libopenturns-dev.  It
> is not clear to me whether these dependencies are really necessary,
> but this is another story.
> 
> Please tell me whether uploading openturns 1.1-3 into unstable is fine by you.
> 
As long as libopenturns has no reverse dependencies I don't think
there's anything for -release to do here.  The current blocker is the
mips/mipsel OODs.  Which I guess want a ftp.d.o removal bug.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: