[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#717079: marked as done (britney: migration of wireshark to testing is blocked)



Your message dated Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:59:37 +0200
with message-id <20130716145937.GD4216@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#717079: britney: migration of wireshark to testing is blocked
has caused the Debian Bug report #717079,
regarding britney: migration of wireshark to testing is blocked
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
717079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi,

The migration of wireshark 1.10.0-2 to testing is blocked due to
missing lib.*2 binary packages.
The new source package renamed those binary packages to lib.*3 thus it
is not a bug in packaging AFAIK.

Cheers,
Balint

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Bálint Réczey (2013-07-16):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The migration of wireshark 1.10.0-2 to testing is blocked due to
> missing lib.*2 binary packages.
> The new source package renamed those binary packages to lib.*3 thus it
> is not a bug in packaging AFAIK.

http://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html#wireshark
http://nthykier.wordpress.com/2013/07/14/britney-excuses-ood/
https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
https://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt

→ if anything, asking for a decruft (on the ftpmaster side) is what you
need. Just pinged them on IRC; closing this bug report accordingly.

Mraw,
KiBi.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: