Bug#712622: pu: package wv2/0.4.2.dfsg.1-9.1
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 18:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 02:36 +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:26:39PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > What version were you proposing to use for the re-repack?
> >
> > I'm open to guidance as to what's best.
> >
> > The repacked upstream tarball would be the same as testing/unstable has,
> > so perhaps 0.4.2.dfsg.2-1~deb7+1 (and 0.4.2.dfsg.2-1~deb6+1 for opu)?
>
> ~deb7u1 and ~deb6u1 would be more consistent with our usual numbering
> policy (well, for wheezy, but ~squeeze wouldn't really work in this
> case).
Flagged for acceptance; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: