[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#705692: marked as done (transition: packagekit 0.8)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:12:03 +0200
with message-id <20130710221203.GM28839@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#705692: transition: packagekit
has caused the Debian Bug report #705692,
regarding transition: packagekit 0.8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
705692: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705692
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

I would like to request a transition to PackageKit 0.8.x
The original source package of PackageKit contained two libraries,
libpackagekit-glib2 and libpackagekit-qt2, with the new 0.8.x release, the Qt
version was split out to a separate source package.
Reverse dependencies of libpackagekit-glib2:
  gnome-settings-daemon
  listaller-devtools
  listaller
  liblistaller-glib0
  indicator-session
  gnome-settings-daemon
  gnome-packagekit-tools
  gnome-packagekit-session
  gnome-packagekit
(listaller, gnome-settings-daemon, gnome-packagekit, indicator-session)

Reverse dependencies of libpackagekit-qt2-2:
 apper

All dependencies have already been prepared in Experimental. (only about
indicator-session I am not sure...)
GNOME stuff >= 3.6 just needs a simple rebuild to work with the new PK. All
other packages are adjusted to work with the new version in their recent
versions in Experimental. Indicator-session might also only need a binNMU.

The new PackageKit also changed it's DBus API, so software which accesses the
DBus API without one of the PK libraries might break temporarily during the
transition.
Kind regards,
    Matthias Klumpp

Ben file:

title = "packagekit";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libpackagekit-glib2-14" | .depends ~ "libpackagekit-
glib2-16";
is_good = .depends ~ "libpackagekit-glib2-16";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libpackagekit-glib2-14";

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 17:51:28 +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> I would like to request a transition to PackageKit 0.8.x
> The original source package of PackageKit contained two libraries,
> libpackagekit-glib2 and libpackagekit-qt2, with the new 0.8.x release, the Qt
> version was split out to a separate source package.

packagekit |       0.8.9-2 |    testing | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc

Closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: