[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#714794: pu: package sikuli/1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-5+deb7u1



Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy

On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 23:15 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Please consider accepting this pu which fixes RC bug #714393 in sikuli-ide.

I'm slightly confused by the fix, but happy to believe I'm missing
something obvious...

++LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/@DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH@/jni:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH LC_NUMERIC=C exec /usr/bin/java -cp "/usr/share/java/jna.jar:/usr/share/java/asm3.jar:/usr/share/java/asm3-commons.jar:/usr/share/java/antlr3-runtime.jar:/usr/share/java/libconstantine-java.jar:/usr/share/java/jython.jar:/usr/share/java/commons-cli.jar:/usr/share/java/JXGrabKey.jar:/usr/share/java/json_simple.jar:/usr/share/java/swing-layout.jar:/usr/share/java/swingx-core.jar:/usr/share/java/forms.jar:/usr/share/java/mac_widgets.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar:/usr/share/sikuli/sikuli-ide.jar:/usr/share/java/sikuli-script.jar" -Dsikuli.console=true -Dsikuli.debug=0 -Xms64M -Xmx512M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Dpython.home=/usr/share/jython -Dpython.path="/usr/share/sikuli/Lib" -Dpython.cachedir=$HOME/.jython-cache org.sikuli.ide.SikuliIDE "$@"
[...]
--- sikuli-1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1/debian/rules      2013-07-02 22:29:53.000000000 +0200
+++ sikuli-1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1/debian/rules      2013-07-02 22:54:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -50,5 +50,6 @@
        
        mkdir -p debian/sikuli-ide/usr/bin
        install sikuli-ide/target/linux/Sikuli-IDE/sikuli-ide.sh debian/sikuli-ide/usr/bin/sikuli-ide
+       sed -i "s/@DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH@/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/" debian/sikuli-ide/usr/bin/sikuli-ide

sikuli-ide is an architecture:all package, so only built as part of the
maintainer upload. The path to which it points, otoh, is in an
architecture-dependent package (and an architecture-dependent path);
this means that the two paths will only match for users installing
libsikuli-script-jni on the same architecture as the arch:all package
was built on.

Regards,

Adam


Reply to: