Re: tiff 4.x (libtiff5) transition
- To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: tiff 4.x (libtiff5) transition
- From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:17:28 +0200
- Message-id: <20130602191728.GA12474@elende>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-release@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20130601145540.0542213282.qww314159@soup>
- References: <20130506102958.0230117954.qww314159@jberkenbilt-linux.appiancorp.com> <20130514110904.0207178878.qww314159@jberkenbilt-linux.appiancorp.com> <20130601145540.0542213282.qww314159@soup>
Hi Jay
Disclaimer, I'm not part of the release team but have only one comment
on the message below:
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 02:55:40PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> It's been a few weeks since my original post about the libtiff
> transition, and I haven't heard any responses. While I appreciate that
> this is not at the top of your long list, I would really appreciate some
> kind of response if only an indication that you've got it on your list
> and will prioritize it when you have a chance. Mainly I'm interested to
> know whether you think my plan is sound and whether you have any idea
> when we might be able to move forward.
>
> In the mean time, I'm going to move forward with uploading new versions,
> etc., without changing the current packaging scheme since I don't want
> to make a change that will make things harder than necessary. In my
> original message, I mentioned the versions that would be part of the
> transition, so clearly those versions are going to change now. I just
> don't want anyone to think that I have given up waiting and am going to
> push forward. Thanks.
The problem might be the following: debian-release has quite big
amount of traffic and your message might be gone under. You can open a
bugreport against release.debian.org so that the transition can be
documented in the BTS, see examples in [1].
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=release.debian.org;dist=unstable#_0_5_4
Regards,
Salvatore
Reply to: