(/me subscribed to -release) Quoting Adam D. Barratt (adam@adam-barratt.org.uk): > On 2013-06-01 6:01, Christian PERRIER wrote: > >Quoting Adam D. Barratt (adam@adam-barratt.org.uk): > > > >>We've had a quick chat about this, and our preference would be for > >>the option you've termed "ugly". Now that we've stopped using the > >>three part versioning, it seems more logical for wheezy to be > >>"Debian 7" and for the issue files to reflect that. > > > >If this is the chosen design, why not have /etc/issue forget about > >the > >".0" part, then? > > That's exactly what Santiago's "ugly" option does. debian_release > continues to change at each point release, the other files are > modified to just use "7". Is there a rationale for *not* using Santiago's good option? (feel free to redirect this to another ML as I know the release team is not always fond of -release being used as a discussion list)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature