On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:07:04 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > --- expect-5.45/debian/control > > +++ expect-5.45/debian/control > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > > Package: expect > > Architecture: any > > Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends} > > +Breaks: expectk (<< 5.45) > > AFAIK you should use "Conflicts" if you want to get a package removed. > A versioned "Breaks" is better suited when you want to force the upgrade > of the broken package but in this case, there's no updated package, so > you should avoid it and favor "Conflicts". > Anything like that needs to get tons of testing to ensure it doesn't have unwanted results in squeeze to wheezy upgrades. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature