Hi, On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:53:38PM +0000, Jon Dowland wrote: > I've just uploaded chocolate-doom/1.7.0-2, with one fix, a documentation > fix only: > > > * Add myself back to uploaders. > > 1.7.0-1 has no humans in Maintainer and no Uploaders which is a policy > violation. > > HOWEVER! > > There are a number of other documentation problems in chocolate-doom which > I could fix, if the release team would approve them for wheezy. They are: > > > obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright maintainer upstream-contact (paragraph at line 1) > > obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright name upstream-name (paragraph at line 1) > > obsolete-field-in-dep5-copyright format-specification format (paragraph at line 1) > > comma-separated-files-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 19 > > missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright public domain (paragraph at line 69) > > duplicate-changelog-files usr/share/doc/chocolate-doom/ChangeLog.gz usr/share/doc/chocolate-doom/changelog.gz > > If the release team would be prepared to accept fixes for the above into > wheezy, I'll do a -3 upload to unstable fixing them all. Please only unblock > -2 if you are happy to fix the Uploaders issue *but not* any of the above. > > FINALLY! > > I could also fix > > > out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.3) > > at the same time, which is almost certainly only a documentation fix too, > but for some reason I'd be more hesitant to do that. I would accept the Uploaders fix and the other documentation fixes along with it, but not the standards version. Can you prepare a debdiff before uploading and send it to this bug please? Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature