[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#697691: preapproval unblock: dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-7



Le samedi 19 janvier 2013 13:31:59, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, Jan  8, 2013 at 16:01:06 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> > 
> > Please unblock package dspam
> > 
> > [this is a preapproval unblock request]
> > 
> > Bug #695275 "harmful actions in multiple postrm scripts of M-A:same
> > packages" was not fixed completely by previous upload to t-p-u. Indeed,
> > many more resources are shared between several architecture of a same
> > package, for instance configuration file.
> > 
> > As such, the least intrusive change now is to just disable multiarch.
> > It's not even much a big loss since the libraries shipped by src:dspam
> > are private libraries (plugins).
> 
> ack.
> 
> > Since multi-arch is disabled, I decided to restore the old postinst
> > script of libdspam7 which was in testing before last upload.
> 
> Still not a fan of this.

In fine you decide wether it's fine or not for tpu. If you don't want this 
I'll comply for the tpu upload. I put it back because I assumed it was the 
recommended procedure. It's mentionned several time in policy bug #621833 for 
instance.

I'll wait for your answer about this (can I keep it or not) and then upload to 
tpu.

> 
> Cheers,
> Julien

Thanks for your hard work toward releasing Wheezy.

Best regards,

Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: