[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#697649: marked as done (pre-approve for freeze exception: snacc 1.3.1-2)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2013 21:21:05 +0100
with message-id <CAK0Odpzm=0U0f-c1mh2L27WGfRbTjNywhpK2kCnGU4CQr44A4Q@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#697649: pre-approve for freeze exception: snacc 1.3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #697649,
regarding pre-approve for freeze exception: snacc 1.3.1-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
697649: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697649
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Dear Release Team,

I would like to update the snacc package enabling multiarch for the
shipped libraries.
The debdiff also adds a watch file which I can remove if its presence
blocks getting the freeze exception.

Changes:
 snacc (1.3.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Bart Martens ]
   * add watch file
 .
   [ Balint Reczey ]
   * multiarch support

Cheers,
Balint

Attachment: snacc-1.3.1-1-1.3.1-2.debdiff
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
2013/1/8 Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 01:20 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> I would like to update the snacc package enabling multiarch for the
>> shipped libraries.
>
> I'm afraid it's too late for such changes to make it to wheezy imo. I'm
> also not sure what the rationale would be for wheezy - the only user in
> the archive appears to be wireshark, which doesn't seem like the sort of
> application one would install multiple architectures of simultaneously.
OK. I agree that it is not really important to update snacc.
I'll upload the new package after the release.

Cheers,
Balint

--- End Message ---
Reply to: