[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#697444: unblock: exim4/4.80-7



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package exim4. This is a minimal single-bugfix upload
for #697057. 

Debian's exim configuration optionally allows to use spfquery to run
SPF-checks on incoming mail.  Due to insufficient quoting it is
possible to pass on arbitrary arguments to spfquery and therefore
bypass SPF checks.

unblock exim4/4.80-7

thanks, cu andreas
File lists identical (after any substitutions)

Control files of package exim4: lines which differ (wdiff format)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-4.80-6-] {+4.80-7+}

Control files of package exim4-base: lines which differ (wdiff format)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-4.80-6-] {+4.80-7+}

Control files of package exim4-config: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-4.80-6-] {+4.80-7+}

Control files of package exim4-daemon-heavy: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-4.80-6-] {+4.80-7+}

Control files of package exim4-daemon-heavy-dbg: lines which differ (wdiff format)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-4.80-6-] {+4.80-7+}

Control files of package exim4-daemon-light: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-4.80-6-] {+4.80-7+}

Control files of package exim4-daemon-light-dbg: lines which differ (wdiff format)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-4.80-6-] {+4.80-7+}

Control files of package exim4-dbg: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-4.80-6-] {+4.80-7+}

Control files of package exim4-dev: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-4.80-6-] {+4.80-7+}

Control files of package eximon4: lines which differ (wdiff format)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-4.80-6-] {+4.80-7+}




diff -Nru exim4-4.80/debian/changelog exim4-4.80/debian/changelog
--- exim4-4.80/debian/changelog	2012-11-21 19:08:56.000000000 +0100
+++ exim4-4.80/debian/changelog	2013-01-02 19:37:26.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+exim4 (4.80-7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Use exim's ${quote:xxx} operator when invoking spfquery to disallow
+    bypassing of SPF validation by using special mailbox names. (Thanks to
+    Lekensteyn for diagnosis and testing.) Closes: #697057
+
+ -- Andreas Metzler <ametzler@debian.org>  Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:37:21 +0100
+
 exim4 (4.80-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Cherrypick two changes from GIT:
diff -Nru exim4-4.80/debian/debconf/conf.d/acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt exim4-4.80/debian/debconf/conf.d/acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt
--- exim4-4.80/debian/debconf/conf.d/acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt	2012-09-23 12:07:23.000000000 +0200
+++ exim4-4.80/debian/debconf/conf.d/acl/30_exim4-config_check_rcpt	2013-01-02 19:36:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -265,10 +265,10 @@
     log_message = SPF check failed.
     !acl = acl_local_deny_exceptions
     condition = ${run{/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl --ip \
-                   \"$sender_host_address\" --identity \
+                   ${quote:$sender_host_address} --identity \
                    ${if def:sender_address_domain \
-                       {--scope mfrom  --identity \"$sender_address\"}\
-                       {--scope helo --identity  \"$sender_helo_name\"}}}\
+                       {--scope mfrom  --identity ${quote:$sender_address}}\
+                       {--scope helo --identity ${quote:$sender_helo_name}}}}\
                    {no}{${if eq {$runrc}{1}{yes}{no}}}}
 
   defer

Reply to: