On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 02:30:13PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Indeed. In any case, were the new version to be accepted in to the > > release then the appropriate route would be via unstable, not direct > > to t-p-u. > Works for me. I'll toss 9.8.4 into sid. As for getting it into wheezy, > it'll make the support life easier for the inevitable security fixes that > will follow. There are probably other reasons. I unblocked it now. I hope that I don't regret that. I'm unhappy about how this went, but I think we should have the fixes 9.8.4 provides in wheezy. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature