[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#692566: marked as done (Freeze exception request for meld 1.6.1-1)



Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:09:43 +0000
with message-id <1357160983.28716.11.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#692566: meld: recommend accepting
has caused the Debian Bug report #692566,
regarding Freeze exception request for meld 1.6.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
692566: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692566
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Dear Release Team,

I would like to update the meld package with important isolated fixes
released by upstream.

Changes:
 meld (1.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release

The changes are minimal:

rbalint@chaos:~/projects/meld$ git diff 1.6.0..1.6.1 --stat
 NEWS              |   17 +++++++++++++++++
 meld/dirdiff.py   |   17 ++++++++++++-----
 meld/meldapp.py   |    2 +-
 meld/misc.py      |    2 +-
 meld/vc/bzr.py    |   11 +++++++++--
 meld/vc/fossil.py |    2 +-
 meld/vcview.py    |   10 +++++++---
 7 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

The changes are listed here:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/meld/log/?h=meld-1.6

Cheers,
Balint
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 20:41 +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 08:25:20AM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > Attaching the debdiff.
> 
> I reviewed the attached debdiff and recommend that the release team accept
> it. The fixes are isolated and proportionate, and fix important issues even
> though there are not corresponding RC bugs.
> 
> An RM should review the diff before unblocking but it is low-hanging fruit
> and should not take too much time.

Ack. Reviewed and unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: