On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 13:09:53 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 01/02/2013 11:53 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 00:55:27 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote: > > > >>> They were generated with 2.0.1 and 2.0.4 vs 2.0.7 in testing > >>> the difference is mostly bugfixes and minor enhancements according to > >>> swig release notes. > >>> > >> > >> but this does not look so good: > >> SWIG-2.0.8 summary: > >> - Fix a couple of regressions introduced in 2.0.5 and 2.0.7. > >> - Minor fixes/enhancements for C#, Java, Octave, Perl and Python. > >> > >> swig2.0.8 is only in unstable and there is no unblock filed :/ > >> > > Have you tried comparing the files generated by swig 2.0.7 vs 2.0.8 for > > scipy? > > > > Thanks, > > Julien > > > > the difference is only catching of memory allocation failures of this type: > Thanks, that's sort of what I expected from reading the swig diff, but confirmation is good :) Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature