[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#689572: marked as done (nmu: packages linked against libhdf5-7 << 1.8.8-7.1 )

Your message dated Wed, 2 Jan 2013 12:20:41 +0100
with message-id <20130102112041.GH5634@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689572: nmu: packages linked against libhdf5-7 << 1.8.8-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689572,
regarding nmu: packages linked against libhdf5-7 << 1.8.8-7.1 
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689572
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org

	There're several packages currently in Debian testing having a
	versioned dependency on the semi-virtual libhdf5-7 package
	(apparently as the result of being built prior to Source: hdf5
	1.8.8-7.1 propagating to testing on 2012-02-23.)

	Consequently, these packages cannot be installed along with any
	of the other libraries providing libhdf5-7 (check, e. g., [1].)
	I'm therefore suggesting re-building these packages against the
	now-current libhdf5-7, with binNMU's as specified below.

	TIA.

nmu libcgns_3.1.3.4-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 
nmu nexus_4.2.1-svn1614-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 
nmu r-cran-hdf5_1.6.10-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 
nmu tessa_0.3.1-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 
nmu udav_0.7.1.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 

	The hdf-eos5_5.1.14+dfsg.1-1 currently in Debian unstable fixes
	the issue (as well as a few others), but unless it's unblocked
	(and enters Debian testing), it has to be re-built just as well:

nmu hdf-eos5_5.1.13.dfsg.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 

[1] http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libhdf5-7

	JFTR, the respective Source: hdf5 Debian changelog [2] entry is:

--cut: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.8.8-9/changelog --
hdf5 (1.8.8-7.1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Stop building the c++ libraries, nothing uses them.  And don't version the
    libhdf5-7 symbols file, so the dependency can also be satisfied by the mpi
    packages' Provides.
  * Use DEB_HOST_ARCH instead of DEB_BUILD_ARCH in debian/rules.
  * Don't require root for debian/rules clean.

 -- Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>  Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:25:35 +0000
--cut: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.8.8-9/changelog --

	The PTS entries for the packages affected are as follows.

http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hdf-eos5.html
    • [2012-02-24] hdf-eos5 5.1.13.dfsg.1-3 MIGRATED to testing
      (Britney)

http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcgns.html
    • [2012-01-24] Accepted 3.1.3.4-1 in unstable (low) (Sylvestre
      Ledru)

http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nexus.html
    • [2011-07-31] Accepted 4.2.1-svn1614-1 in unstable (low) (Tobias
      Stefan Richter)

	(Although nexus was re-built once as 4.2.1-svn1614-1+b1, it was
	on 2012-01-26, thus before hdf5_1.8.8-7.1, and still bearing a
	possibly unwarranted versioned dependency on libhdf5-7.)

http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/r-cran-hdf5.html
    • [2012-01-18] Accepted 1.6.10-1 in unstable (low) (Dirk
      Eddelbuettel)

http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tessa.html
    • [2012-02-20] Accepted 0.3.1-6 in unstable (low) (Josselin Mouette)

http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/udav.html
    • [2012-01-25] Accepted 0.7.1.2-3 in unstable (low) (Salvatore
      Bonaccorso)

-- 
FSF associate member #7257

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Oct  4, 2012 at 14:01:17 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
> 
> 	There're several packages currently in Debian testing having a
> 	versioned dependency on the semi-virtual libhdf5-7 package
> 	(apparently as the result of being built prior to Source: hdf5
> 	1.8.8-7.1 propagating to testing on 2012-02-23.)
> 
> 	Consequently, these packages cannot be installed along with any
> 	of the other libraries providing libhdf5-7 (check, e. g., [1].)
> 	I'm therefore suggesting re-building these packages against the
> 	now-current libhdf5-7, with binNMU's as specified below.
> 
> 	TIA.
> 
> nmu libcgns_3.1.3.4-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 
> nmu nexus_4.2.1-svn1614-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 
> nmu r-cran-hdf5_1.6.10-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 
> nmu tessa_0.3.1-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 
> nmu udav_0.7.1.2-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 
> 
Scheduled.

> 	The hdf-eos5_5.1.14+dfsg.1-1 currently in Debian unstable fixes
> 	the issue (as well as a few others), but unless it's unblocked
> 	(and enters Debian testing), it has to be re-built just as well:
> 
> nmu hdf-eos5_5.1.13.dfsg.1-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against libhdf5-7 >= 1.8.8-7.1' 
> 
Meh.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: