Your message dated Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:10:21 +0100 with message-id <20131225101021.GL4822@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#712688: transition: gdal has caused the Debian Bug report #712688, regarding transition: gdal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 712688: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712688 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: gdal
- From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <frankie@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:27:41 +0200
- Message-id: <20130618142741.18677.54491.reportbug@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear RMs I'm going to provide a long due change to gdal library (current 1.9.0) in sid. In order to solve properly problems of programs that both link geotiff, tiff and gdal libraries, I'm going to drop direct tiff/geotiff functions providing. Upstreams provide now a renaming feature for that (note that the internal gdal version indeed use a bit different ABI) and the result will be a bit different API/ABI starting from next 1.10.0 version. (See http://wiki.orfeo-toolbox.org/index.php/Link_conflicts about that and the partially working fix of #558733) Unfortunately, upstreams do not consider that a true API change (in some way the use of geotiff/tiff funcs out of the gdal interface is considered de facto a deprecated use). So the official upstream soname is indeed the same. BTW, without annoying all of you with a so looooooong history about this issue, I'm going to introduce a new libgdal1h binary package (h means hidden, better suggestions are welcome :)), with a new SONAME libgdal.1h to manage a decent migration to the new flavor. This will sacrifice third-parties sw compatibility, but well, who cares? It would be break anyway. That could also imply that some r-deps will have to explicitly link now tiff/geotiff libraries instead of using the gdal inner one. As usual I will start all the transition in experimental ASAP. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <frankie@debian.org>, 712688-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#712688: transition: gdal
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:10:21 +0100
- Message-id: <20131225101021.GL4822@betterave.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <20130618142741.18677.54491.reportbug@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it>
- References: <20130618142741.18677.54491.reportbug@blegrez.ba.issia.cnr.it>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 16:27:41 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > I'm going to provide a long due change to gdal library (current 1.9.0) in sid. libgdal1 is now gone from testing (except on ia64). Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---