Bug#728179: Is anyone handling this?

To: 728179@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#728179: Is anyone handling this?
From: Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 19:02:00 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1385920920.3714.35.camel@localhost>
Reply-to: Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se>, 728179@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <1385797978.3714.25.camel@localhost>
References: <1384790561.25697.46.camel@ellert.tsl.uu.se> <1385797978.3714.25.camel@localhost>

Due to changes in other build dependencies unrelated to the gsoap update
the cgsi-gsoap and lcgdm packages needed changes to the source package.
The need for binnmu of these packages therefore no longer exists.

The following is still needed:

 nmu gridsite . amd64 i386 powerpc sparc . -m "Rebuild against libgsoap4"
 nmu voms . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libgsoap4"
 nmu srm-ifce . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libgsoap4"
 nmu gfal2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libgsoap4 and libgridsite2"
 dw gfal2 . ALL . -m "srm-ifce-dev (>> 1.18.0-1+b1)"
 nmu condor . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libgsoap4"
 nmu virtualbox . amd64 i386 . -m "Rebuild against libgsoap4"

	Mattias

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#728179: Is anyone handling this?
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Bug#728179: Thanks
  - From: Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@fysast.uu.se>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#708401: transition: suitesparse
Next by Date: Bug#728179: Is anyone handling this?
Previous by thread: Bug#708401: transition: suitesparse
Next by thread: Bug#728179: Is anyone handling this?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread