On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 21:41:01 +0000, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi, > > The tracker for this transition[0] doesn't show either good or bad > status for package aqualung. In fact it still uses the old libav and > requires an NMU, but it will FTBFS with the new version. [I plan to > prepare an NMU fixing this and another RC bug]. > > [0]: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libav9.html > > aqualung's dependencies refer to packages matching > /lib(avcodec-extra-53|avformat-extra-53|avutil-extra-51)/ > is that bad/unexpected? Could other packages have been missed? > aqualung's dependencies don't match that as far as I can tell. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature