[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#729296: transition: kde 4.11



Previously sent to the wrong bug nr.

----- Forwarded message from Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org> -----

Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:38:55 +0100
From: Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org>
To: 729615@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Bug#729296: Please binNMU kde-style packages against libkdecorations4abi2
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

¡Hola Adam!

El 2013-11-14 a las 15:26 +0000, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> Great; thanks. I've taken the liberty of repurposing this bug
> slightly to track the transition as a whole, as it means we've got a
> central point which reflects the overall status. There's a tracker
> at http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/kde4.11.html ; I
> suspect a lot of the "unknown" is accounted for by packages which
> depend on parts of kde-workspace that haven't changed their package
> name.

I would like to upload a new upstream release of akonadi (1.10.3-1), which
closes #729615 (grave) and #716922 (important).

It's a bugfix release, no abi changes involved, I checked the symbols and the
code changes, this upload doesn't require a transition but I would prefer a
green light anyway as there is a kde4.11 on going transition.

The package can be obtained from:
http://maxy.com.ar/debian/pool/main/a/akonadi/akonadi_1.10.3-1.dsc

Thanks,
-- 
"It is not the task of the University to offer what society asks for, but to
give what society needs."
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
"If I ask another professor what he teaches in the introductory programming
course, whether he answers proudly "Pascal" or diffidently "FORTRAN," I know
that he is teaching a grammar, a set of semantic rules, and some finished
algorithms, leaving the students to discover, on their own, some process of
design."
-- Robert W. Floyd
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: