Re: Bug#710140: gpgme1.0 dropped libgpgme-pth
Am Samstag, den 05.10.2013, 11:41 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli:
> On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:06:14 +0200 Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> [...]
> > Am Sonntag, den 25.08.2013, 12:19 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli:
> [...]
> > > Could you please clarify the status of the bug?
> > > Thanks for your time!
> >
> > CCing release.d.o.
> >
> [...]
> > I'm hereby asking the release team how to proceed? The issue itself
> > seems to have been fixed inside Debian by fixing libgpgme++2, which has
> > already been done [3]. There might be third-party software out there
> > using libgpgme-pth.so or libgpgme++-pth.so.
> [...]
> > [3] http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kdepimlibs/news/20130614T070347Z.html
>
> Dear Daniel,
> first of all thanks for your kind reply.
>
> I waited some time before speaking again, as I was hoping to see some
> comments from other people, possibly members of the release team.
>
> Anyway, do I understand correctly that this issue has currently a
> practical impact only on boxes where non-packaged (== not included in
> Debian) programs or libraries which use libgpgme-pth.so or libgpgme+
> +-pth.so are installed?
> Could you please confirm this?
Seems to be the case, yes. However, upstream removed libgpgme-pth.so
because it didn't get used by others. So the affected user base is very
probably very small and they did not yet speak up. So it seems, there is
currently nobody affected.
Regards, Daniel
Reply to: