Control: tag -1 wheezy Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org> (2013-10-10): > Any chance we could switch to 0.9.12.2 for the next (or after that) > point release? Certainly not for the next point release, due this weekend, and frozen past weekend. > This also contains the somewhat complex backport for CVE-2013-4311 > [1]. Since the branch is for critical (mostly security and crashes) > fixes only it should be a good fit for Debian stable releases. > > The huge diff[2] mostly stems from a new automake bootstrap and most > of our debian/patches moving into the actual release. I'm testing the > release tarballs with libvirt-tck so from a stability stand point we > should be even better off than what we currently ship. > > So o.k. to upload 0.9.12.2-1 to p-u? > Cheers, > -- Guido > > [1] for this to take effect we need a patched polkit first > [2] http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/libvirt/debian/0.9.12.2-1.diff For the record, we tend to prefer having debdiff (or at least debian changelogs) posted to the BTS. Right now I have absolutely no idea which bugs you're trying to get fixed, and whether fixes landed in testing or unstable. But seriously, a 15MB diff is nowhere reviewable. Even if most of it is automake bootstrap and patches moving around. Other team members' mileage may vary… Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature