[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#725311: pu: Getting Debian Edu 7.1+edu0 into the Upcoming stable point release (7.2)



On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 02:47 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> during DebConf13 I (rather briefly) discussed with jcristau and pkern the 
> possibility of getting the changes required for the wheezy based Debian Edu 
> release into Debian wheezy proper, and they generally didnt think the idea was 
> completly insane, following the same exception/assumption which was used for 
> Squeeze: if it only might break Debian Edu and we are willing to deal with it, 
> it might be possible.
[...]
> The 7 packages we would like to get into 7.2 as well are: debian-edu, debian-
> edu-install, debian-edu-config, debian-edu-artwork, debian-edu-doc, 
> sitesummary and slbackup.
[...]
> The complete debdiffs are attached.

No, they're not. :-) (or the mail would probably never have made it to
-release).

> The debian-edu* packages indeed are only relevant for Debian Edu, the only 
> thing which might be a problem is that we reintroduced the binary
> debian-edu-config-gosa-netgroups package (build from d-e-config), which was in 
> squeeze and which we then foolishly removed to fast for wheezy, as we had to 
> add it again, to gain that needed functionality for gosa. But I actually dont 
> see a technical problem with that.

Well, we've always nacked introducing new binary packages in the past.
You mention that it was in squeeze, but I can't see the packages in the
main archive (only for jessie / sid).

> Then there are the slbackup and sitesummary packages, which could be used 
> outside Debian Edu. But sitesummary contains three some important bugfixes 
> (see attached changelog diff) which I believe are suitable for 7.2 by the 
> normal rules anyway (except that they were not filed in the BTS, sigh), while 
> slbackup, well, the changes are probably good to have too. (see attached 
> changelog diff).

slbackup (0.0.12-4) experimental; urgency=low
[...]
  * Change in conffile management:
    + Drop CRON job /etc/cron.daily/slbackup. Re-enable configuration
      of slbackup via debconf templates (closes: #662914).
    + Remove conffile /etc/cron.daily/slbackup via dpkg−maintscript−helper.

Didn't the above change already get NACKed at least once?

Regards,

Adam


Reply to: