On jeu., 2013-10-03 at 20:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [trimmed recipient list] > > On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 19:36 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 07:48 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > ftpmasters, release team: the security team is requesting the removal of > > > the pam-rsa package because we were made aware of the above (#693087) > > > bug: in some situations, pam_rsa module will cause a segfault in > > > xscreensaver, leaving the screen unlocked. > [...] > > > Thus, we'd like the removal from at least testing and unstable. For > > > stable, I'm a bit unsure about how we're supposed to handle a package > > > disparition in stable, so I'm available for discussion (although we > > > don't think it's really supportable in the current state). > > > > I've cloned a copy of the bug for stable, so we can look at that > > separately. > > libpam-rsa got removed from unstable and wheezy (before release), but we > never seem to have dealt with squeeze. If you're (collectively) still in > favour of the removal then we can do that for 6.0.8. > At that point, I guess that's the best solution yes, please go ahead. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part