Bug#711551: pu: package redmine/1.4.4+dfsg1-2
On 30/09/2013 00:42, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Control: tag -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
>
> Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> (2013-06-10):
>> --- redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2013-01-19 15:54:09.000000000 +0100
>> +++ redmine-1.4.4+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2013-06-10 01:01:48.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
>> +redmine (1.4.4+dfsg1-2+deb7u1) proposed-updates; urgency=low
>
> Even though that would work, I'd be happy to see "wheezy" in there,
> which can be useful after a while to figure out which suite was targeted
> at that point (without having to look at the version number, and its
> meaning).
Do you mean it'd be better to use "wheezy-proposed-updates" as distribution ?
>> + [ Ondřej Surý ]
>> + * Pull upstream fixes for Ruby 1.9 as default interpreter:
>> + + Use DateTime.parse as alternative to ParseDate.parsedate,
>> + fixing time series and schedule SVG graphs. (Closes: #700754)
>> + + Use ::Time from global namespace, fixing REST Issue API.
>> + (Closes: #700009)
>
> Assuming the latter change doesn't break the Ruby 1.8 use case (and
> doesn't need a dance similar to the respond_to one in the former),
> please upload (with or without an edit for the above mentioned point).
I'm going to recheck that because i only remember doing it on irb,
not on redmine code.
Thanks for looking into this.
Jérémy.
Reply to: