On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:02:07 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 09/24/2013 09:48 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit : > >> However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about > >> it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team > >> is reading: just let everything transition to testing, and remove the > >> old version of XCP 1.3.2 in testing if that helps, plus add some > >> blocking bugs so that the rest of Debian isn't affected by the (not > >> finished) work on XCP 1.6 for Debian. > > > > More than two weeks later, xen-api is still in testing, and preventing > > the start of the OCaml transition. > > > > If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following > > new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins, > > nova-compute-xen. > > > > xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf > > package and could be removed from testing. > > > > On the other hand, both nova-* packages are built by nova which Julien > > wants to keep in testing. The last changelog entry advertises the > > removal of nova-xcp-plugins, but it is still there. > > > > Thomas, could you please upload a new nova without nova-xcp-plugins and > > nova-compute-xen? > > Well, that's the problem. It would be ok for me to remove > nova-xcp-plugins, though it is not to remove nova-compute-xen, which > needs python-xapi. At least I would like to keep the possibility to > connect to CenOS-based XCP servers using the OpenStack in Debian. > You can do that once xen-api is fixed. Until then, this needs to go. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature