Bug#718501: marked as done (transition: ticcutils)
Your message dated Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:30:03 +0100
with message-id <1379543403.27643.13.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#718501: transition: ticcutils
has caused the Debian Bug report #718501,
regarding transition: ticcutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
718501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: ticcutils
- From: Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian-bugs-20130801-5@mdcc.cx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 17:37:19 +0200
- Message-id: <20130801153719.GY18485@beskar.mdcc.cx>
- In-reply-to: <20130616205855.GA22755@beskar.mdcc.cx>
- References: <20130615163501.GG504@beskar.mdcc.cx> <20130615233755.GM504@beskar.mdcc.cx> <20130616100653.GQ504@beskar.mdcc.cx> <20130616110216.GS504@beskar.mdcc.cx> <20130616205855.GA22755@beskar.mdcc.cx>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
Excuses for the delay in dealing with this issue. Anyway, here it is: I am
requesting a transition from libticcutils1 to libticcutils2. libticcutils1 is
build by ticcutils < 0.4-1. libticcutils2 is build by ticcutils >= 0.4-1. A
soname bump was done upstream. (ticcutils 0.3-1 is in jessie, ticcutils 0.4-4
is in sid now, I have ticcutils 0.4-5 ready for upload to unstable.)
Once this and other upcoming transitions are completed, these bugs:
#717394 [frog] FTBFS: libucto2-dev/libucto-dev not available
#714711 [src:libfolia] libfolia: FTBFS: No package 'ticcutils' found
#713119 [src:mbtserver] mbtserver: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libtimblserver3-dev, libmbt1
will get squashed.
Packages that need to be updated are all maintained by me:
timbl
timblserver
mbt
mbtserver
ucto
libfolia
dimbl
frog
Ben file:
title: ticcutils;
affected: .build-depends ~ "libticcutils-dev" | .build-depends ~ "libticcutils1-dev" | .build-depends ~ "libticcutils2-dev"
good: .depends ~ "libticcutils2"
bad: .depends ~ "libticcutils1"
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian-bugs-20130801-5@mdcc.cx>, 718501-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#718501: transition: ticcutils
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:30:03 +0100
- Message-id: <1379543403.27643.13.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- In-reply-to: <20130801153719.GY18485@beskar.mdcc.cx>
- References: <20130615163501.GG504@beskar.mdcc.cx> <20130615233755.GM504@beskar.mdcc.cx> <20130616100653.GQ504@beskar.mdcc.cx> <20130616110216.GS504@beskar.mdcc.cx> <20130616205855.GA22755@beskar.mdcc.cx> <20130801153719.GY18485@beskar.mdcc.cx>
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 17:37 +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Excuses for the delay in dealing with this issue. Anyway, here it is: I am
> requesting a transition from libticcutils1 to libticcutils2. libticcutils1 is
> build by ticcutils < 0.4-1. libticcutils2 is build by ticcutils >= 0.4-1. A
> soname bump was done upstream. (ticcutils 0.3-1 is in jessie, ticcutils 0.4-4
> is in sid now, I have ticcutils 0.4-5 ready for upload to unstable.)
This is all in testing now, and the old libraries have been removed;
closing.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: