Bug#723044: marked as done (binNMU: tulip 3.7.0dfsg-4 )
Your message dated Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:26:55 +0100
with message-id <1379356015.2507.7.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#723044: binNMU: tulip 3.7.0dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #723044,
regarding binNMU: tulip 3.7.0dfsg-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
723044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723044
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-CC: tulip@packages.debian.org
Please binnmu tulip. Its binary package tulip-abiword version 3.7.0dfsg-4+b1
has dependency binutils (< 2.23.52.20130621). However, sid has
% rmadison -s sid -a amd64 binutils
binutils | 2.23.52.20130828-1 | sid | amd64
Thanks -Ralf.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2013-09-15 at 20:53 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Please binnmu tulip. Its binary package tulip-abiword version 3.7.0dfsg-4+b1
> has dependency binutils (< 2.23.52.20130621). However, sid has
>
> % rmadison -s sid -a amd64 binutils
> binutils | 2.23.52.20130828-1 | sid | amd64
Scheduled.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: