Bug#722643: marked as done (nmu: blueman_1.23+update1-2~bpo70+1)
Your message dated Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:23:28 +0200
with message-id <5232A150.70203@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#722643: nmu: blueman_1.23+update1-2~bpo70+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #722643,
regarding nmu: blueman_1.23+update1-2~bpo70+1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
722643: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722643
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu blueman_1.23+update1-2~bpo70+1 . amd64 . wheezy-backports . -m "Rebuild in a clean wheezy(-backports) environment."
blueman/amd64 depends on several packages that are not in wheezy:
libpango-1.0-0 does-not-exist
libpangocairo-1.0-0 does-not-exist
libpangoft2-1.0-0 does-not-exist
@Christoper: backports must be built in a clean wheezy environment.
Please take care to only upload proper backports in the future.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/13/2013 03:21 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> nmu blueman_1.23+update1-2~bpo70+1 . amd64 . wheezy-backports . -m "Rebuild in a clean wheezy(-backports) environment."
>
> blueman/amd64 depends on several packages that are not in wheezy:
> libpango-1.0-0 does-not-exist
> libpangocairo-1.0-0 does-not-exist
> libpangoft2-1.0-0 does-not-exist
>
> @Christoper: backports must be built in a clean wheezy environment.
> Please take care to only upload proper backports in the future.
Scheduled.
Cheers
Luk
--- End Message ---
Reply to: