On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:16:12 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 09.09.2013 19:32, schrieb Julien Cristau: > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 21:56:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:07:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> > >>> With xorg-server being fixed to no longer FTBFS, there is no more > >>> blocker for this transition afaics and we should be ready to go. We'd > >>> appreciate if we can start this transition as soon as possible, as we > >>> need a newer systemd in various other packages (among them GNOME 3.8). > >>> Also, updating udev is long overdue. > >>> > >>> Would be great if we can get an ack from the release team for the > >>> unstable upload. > >>> > >> ATM this would clash with the libav transition. That one still has a > >> number of build failures unfortunately :( > >> > > Actually we should be ok. systemd should be able to migrate ahead of > > libav9 if it's ready, and britney will keep libudev0 around in testing > > until everything has caught up. > > How can systemd migrate ahead of time if the source package no longer > builds libudev0. Wouldn't that block the testing migration of systemd? > Or is this a special case since in testing libudev0 is built from > another source package (src:udev)? > britney keeps old libs around in testing if they still have reverse deps. Though I had completely forgotten about the source package name change in this case, which should make this even easier. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature