[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#714069: marked as done (nmu: njplot_2.4-2)

Your message dated Sun, 8 Sep 2013 12:12:13 +0200
with message-id <20130908101213.GA21279@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#714069: nmu: njplot_2.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #714069,
regarding nmu: njplot_2.4-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
714069: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714069
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Please schedule a binNMU for njplot to make it pick up libvibrant6 instead of
libvibrant6a.

nmu njplot_2.4-2 . armel armhf mips s390 s390x sparc . -m "Rebuild against libvibrant6."

Ansgar

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:40:09 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:

> On 06/25/2013 17:21, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 13:58:51 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> >> Please schedule a binNMU for njplot to make it pick up libvibrant6 instead of
> >> libvibrant6a.
> >>
> >> nmu njplot_2.4-2 . armel armhf mips s390 s390x sparc . -m "Rebuild against libvibrant6."
> >>
> > Meh, the libvibrant6 name was already taken, renaming things back with
> > an ABI break is a no-no.
> 
> The library package is now named libvibrant6b and njplot should be
> rebuilt on all architectures.
> 
Scheduled.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: