[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#718201: marked as done (nmu: binNMUed M-A: same packages with changelog conflict)

Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:46:09 +0200
with message-id <20130728214609.GJ28839@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#718201: nmu: binNMUed M-A: same packages with changelog conflict
has caused the Debian Bug report #718201,
regarding nmu: binNMUed M-A: same packages with changelog conflict
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
718201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718201
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hi,

to restore multi-arch co-installability of some old binNMUs, I'd like to
rerun these against the newer debhelper (>= 9.20130518) that splits the
binNMU changelog stanza into a separate file.

nmu libopenraw_0.0.9-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild binNMU against newer debhelper to restore multi-arch co-installability."
nmu libftdi_0.20-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild binNMU against newer debhelper to restore multi-arch co-installability."


This is only a partial list. If that approach is OK, I'll look up the
remaining packages.

alternate message suggestion:

-m "Rebuild binNMU against debhelper (>= 9.20130518) to restore
multi-arch co-installability by splitting the binNMU changelog stanza to
a separate file."

hurd is quite often out of sync in the binNMU number compared to other
architectures - should this binNMU be skipped there?
Is an arch list like '. !hurd-i386 .' or '. ALL !hurd-i386 .' possible?

Andreas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 18:37:16 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> Hi,
> 
> to restore multi-arch co-installability of some old binNMUs, I'd like to
> rerun these against the newer debhelper (>= 9.20130518) that splits the
> binNMU changelog stanza into a separate file.
> 
Let's not worry about that stuff until the freeze.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: