Re: iceweasel 17 for wheezy in NEW

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On 2013-06-03 9:46, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> the security update for iceweasel targeted at wheezy ended up in NEW.
> What would you like us to do with it?
>
> We could add the overrides, reject it from NEW and move the package 
> back
> to unchecked. Then it would end in p-u-NEW and you can handle it as 
> you
> see fit.

I think that sounds like a good approach; thanks.

> (Note to self: uploads for some architectures were rejected as
>  experimental had an older version. Those should be removed and
>  the .changes moved back to unchecked as well.)

Regards,

Adam