[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#677574: marked as done (transition: libv8 3.10.8)

Your message dated Fri, 17 May 2013 23:48:55 +0200
with message-id <5196A5C7.90809@melix.org>
and subject line transition: libv8 3.10.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #677574,
regarding transition: libv8 3.10.8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
677574: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677574
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,
i'd like to update libv8 3.8.9.20 to 3.10.8.

* packages needing a simple rebuild (i checked them) :
  + libv8-i18n
  + osmium
  + drizzle

* packages needing more work :
  nodejs (i'm maintaining it and it's ready to be uploaded)

Please note that SONAME is libv8.so.3.10.8 instead of libv8.so.3.10.8.15,
allowing libv8 maintainers to do patch-level updates without the need to
setup a transition. This will hopefully improve the current situation.
I started some discussion about that here :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2012-June/003683.html

Ben file:

title = "libv8";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libv8-3.8.9.20" | .depends ~ "libv8-3.10.8";
is_good = .depends ~ "libv8-3.10.8";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libv8-3.8.9.20";


Regards,
Jérémy.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Both the reverse-dependencies and the target version are outdated.
I'll request a new transition later.

Closing.

(and feeling sorry about that time-wasting mess i did).

--- End Message ---
Reply to: