[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#699171: marked as done (Pre-Approval: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-19)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:52:04 +0200
with message-id <20130429215204.75d925f0@jupiter.home>
and subject line Bug#699171: Pre-Approval: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #699171,
regarding Pre-Approval: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-19
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
699171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699171
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pre-approval

Hello release team,

I ask for pre-approval for package capi4hylafax.

There is a difficult RC bug (#661482) which mention also package hylafax.
To resolve this RC bug a bugfix for hylafax and capi4hylafax is needed. 

As first step here is the bugfix of capi4hylafax:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697733

The updated capi4hylafax 1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-19 fixes a part of RC bug
#661482:

  * Optimize postrm script and add new postinst script to work together
      with hylafax-server and its 'mountbind'. (See: #661482)

Details are in the attached debdiff.

Many thanks for your work,

---
Have a nice day.

Joachim (Germany)

Attachment: debdiff_capi4hylafax_300-19.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
This request for pre-approval is obsolete. So I close it.

---
Have a nice day.
Joachim (Germany)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: