[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706271: marked as done (t-p-u: libdmtx/0.7.2-2+build1)

Your message dated Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:01:58 +0100
with message-id <1367172118.13168.139.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#706271: t-p-u: libdmtx/0.7.2-2+build1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706271,
regarding t-p-u: libdmtx/0.7.2-2+build1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
706271: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706271
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package libdmtx

Hi,

I'd like to NMU libdmtx and do a no-change rebuild in t-p-u to fix two
issues:
* get rid of the binNMU
* fix MA incompatible gzip compression
  http://lists.debian.org/517B2943.7020209@debian.org

I verified that i386 and amd64 are now co-installable.

Andreas

PS: I deliberately choose +build1 instead of +deb7u1 becaus ethat sorts
between +b1 and +deb7u1

unblock libdmtx/0.7.2-2+build1

diff -Nru libdmtx-0.7.2/debian/changelog libdmtx-0.7.2/debian/changelog
--- libdmtx-0.7.2/debian/changelog	2012-03-06 03:09:05.000000000 +0100
+++ libdmtx-0.7.2/debian/changelog	2013-04-27 14:44:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libdmtx (0.7.2-2+build1) testing; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * No-change rebuild to restore multi-arch co-installability. Fix
+    incompatibly compressed files and clear binNMU.
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>  Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:34:19 +0200
+
 libdmtx (0.7.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Updated standards.

File lists identical (after any substitutions)

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------
Source: libdmtx [-(0.7.2-2)-]
Version: [-0.7.2-2+b1-] {+0.7.2-2+build1+}
File lists identical (after any substitutions)

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.4), libdmtx0a (>= 0.7.2), libgomp1 (>= 4.2.1), libmagickcore5 (>= [-8:6.7.4.0),-] {+8:6.7.7.10),+} libmagickwand5 (>= [-8:6.7.4.0)-] {+8:6.7.7.10)+}
Installed-Size: [-69-] {+70+}
Source: libdmtx [-(0.7.2-2)-]
Version: [-0.7.2-2+b1-] {+0.7.2-2+build1+}
File lists identical (after any substitutions)

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------
Depends: libdmtx0a (= [-0.7.2-2+b1)-] {+0.7.2-2+build1)+}
Installed-Size: [-333-] {+334+}
Source: libdmtx [-(0.7.2-2)-]
Version: [-0.7.2-2+b1-] {+0.7.2-2+build1+}

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 19:31 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2013-04-27 18:49, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 15:49 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >> I'd like to NMU libdmtx and do a no-change rebuild in t-p-u to fix two
> >> issues:
> >> * get rid of the binNMU
> >> * fix MA incompatible gzip compression
> >>   http://lists.debian.org/517B2943.7020209@debian.org
[...]
> I uploaded the i386 build s.t. we can verify that the amd64 build done
> on a buildd produces an identical .gz file this time.

Approved.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: