[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#705860: marked as done (RM: owncloud/4.0.4debian2-3.3)



Your message dated Sun, 21 Apr 2013 11:34:40 +0100
with message-id <20130421103439.GA15800@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#705860: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#705860: aptitude: removed (from release) package does not appear in list "obsolete ... packages"
has caused the Debian Bug report #705860,
regarding RM: owncloud/4.0.4debian2-3.3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
705860: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705860
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.8.2-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainers,

the system has been upgraded from Squeeze/Stable to Wheezy/Testing some time before
Wheezy-Release. Owncloud was available and I installed it. Then owncloud was removed from Wheezy.

Even after apt-get update (and aptitude update) owncloud still not appears
in the list "Obsolete and Locally Created Packages".

# aptitude versions owncloud
Package owncloud:                        
p   4.0.4debian2-3.3	testing-proposed-updates        500 
i   4.0.8debian-1.6					100 

# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb     http://debian:9999/debian/ wheezy main 
deb     http://debian:9999/debian-security/ wheezy/updates main 
deb     http://debian:9999/debian wheezy-updates main 
deb     http://debian:9999/debian wheezy-proposed-updates main 

I got no information, that the installed package has been removed from
Wheezy.
Furthermore no information, that there will be no security updates for
owncloud!

Maybe this is only a problem in understanding on my side. But maybe there is
a conceptual problem which leads to security risks.


Thanks & kind regards,

Paul

-- Package-specific info:
Terminal: xterm
$DISPLAY not set.
which aptitude: /usr/bin/aptitude

aptitude version information:
aptitude 0.6.8.2 compiled at Nov  5 2012 06:20:41
Compiler: g++ 4.7.2
Compiled against:
  apt version 4.12.0
  NCurses version 5.9
  libsigc++ version: 2.2.10
  Ept support enabled.
  Gtk+ support disabled.
  Qt support disabled.

Current library versions:
  NCurses version: ncurses 5.9.20110404
  cwidget version: 0.5.16
  Apt version: 4.12.0

aptitude linkage:
	linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xb7710000)
	libapt-pkg.so.4.12 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.4.12 (0xb71a7000)
	libncursesw.so.5 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libncursesw.so.5 (0xb7174000)
	libtinfo.so.5 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.5 (0xb7154000)
	libsigc-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libsigc-2.0.so.0 (0xb714e000)
	libcwidget.so.3 => /usr/lib/libcwidget.so.3 (0xb704e000)
	libept.so.1.aptpkg4.12 => /usr/lib/libept.so.1.aptpkg4.12 (0xb6fbb000)
	libxapian.so.22 => /usr/lib/sse2/libxapian.so.22 (0xb6dd2000)
	libz.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0xb6db9000)
	libsqlite3.so.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0 (0xb6d07000)
	libboost_iostreams.so.1.49.0 => /usr/lib/libboost_iostreams.so.1.49.0 (0xb6cf0000)
	libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/nosegneg/libpthread.so.0 (0xb6cd6000)
	libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb6bea000)
	libm.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/nosegneg/libm.so.6 (0xb6bc4000)
	libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb6ba6000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/nosegneg/libc.so.6 (0xb6a40000)
	libutil.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/nosegneg/libutil.so.1 (0xb6a3c000)
	libdl.so.2 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/nosegneg/libdl.so.2 (0xb6a38000)
	libbz2.so.1.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libbz2.so.1.0 (0xb6a27000)
	libuuid.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1 (0xb6a20000)
	librt.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/nosegneg/librt.so.1 (0xb6a17000)
	/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7711000)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii  aptitude-common           0.6.8.2-1
ii  libapt-pkg4.12            0.9.7.8
ii  libboost-iostreams1.49.0  1.49.0-3.2
ii  libc6                     2.13-38
ii  libcwidget3               0.5.16-3.4
ii  libept1.4.12              1.0.9
ii  libgcc1                   1:4.7.2-5
ii  libncursesw5              5.9-10
ii  libsigc++-2.0-0c2a        2.2.10-0.2
ii  libsqlite3-0              3.7.13-1
ii  libstdc++6                4.7.2-5
ii  libtinfo5                 5.9-10
ii  libxapian22               1.2.12-2
ii  zlib1g                    1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

Versions of packages aptitude recommends:
pn  apt-xapian-index                <none>
pn  aptitude-doc-en | aptitude-doc  <none>
pn  libparse-debianchangelog-perl   <none>
ii  sensible-utils                  0.0.7

Versions of packages aptitude suggests:
pn  debtags  <none>
ii  tasksel  3.14+nmu2

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 05:43:44PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 RM: owncloud/4.0.4debian2-3.3
> Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
> Control: user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Control: usertags -1 + rm
> 
> Release team
> 
> owncloud is recently removed from testing, please also remove from
> t-p-u.  (Wrong avenue?  Please redirect me.)

Removed.

Thanks,
-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: