Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 09:44:53PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package libaqbanking
>
> A user reported to me in private that the AqBanking plugins to Gwenhywfar get
> lost on upgrade from squeezy to wheezy. The reason is that the package
> libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar47 got renamed to
> libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60, but (intentionally) no other package
> depends or recommends the package libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60.
There seems to be some confusion:
Package: libaqbanking34
Recommends: libaqbanking34-plugins, libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60
Isn't this enough to bring in the right version of the plugin? It did in
my test of a squeeze system with libaqbanking29 installed, followed by
aptitude full-upgrade (with Recommends enabled, perhaps that's
significant?):
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libaqbanking-plugins-libgwenhywfar60{a} libaqbanking34{a}
libaqbanking34-plugins{a} libaqhbci20{a} libaqofxconnect7{a}
libgwenhywfar-data{a} libgwenhywfar60{a}
I may have missed something, please correct me if so.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature